Home

Bio stuff

Courses

Research

Department

Biopsychology Concentration

Personal stuff

Our laboratory has recently been involved in several types of work. In the first, we studied the nature of individual differences in mice across a number of learning and memory tasks. Our work in this area is represented by these articles:

Locurto, C. & Scanlon, C. (1998). Individual differences and a spatial learning factor in two strains of mice. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 344-352. PDF

Locurto, C., Fortin, E., & Sullivan, R. (2003).The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous strain mice across problem types and motivational conditions. Genes, Brain, & Behavior, 2, 1-16. PDF

Locurto, Charles; Benoit, Andrea; Crowley, Caitlin; Miele, Andrea (2006).The Structure of Individual Differences in Batteries of Rapid Acquisition Tasks in Mice. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 120, 378-388. PDF

Locurto, C. (2007).Individual differences and animal personality. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, 67-78. PDF

Carere, C. & Locurto, C. (2011). Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition. Current Zoology, 57, 491-498.

As an outgrowth of our work with mice, we also came across an interesting phenomenon in which mice shift their preference for where they choose to escape from aversive stimulation on a trial by trial basis. Our work on this topic is given below:

Locurto, C. Emidy, C., & Hannan, S. (2002).Mice (Mus musculus) learn a win-shift but not a win-stay contingency under water escape motivation.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 308-312. PDF

Locurto, C. (2005). Further evidence that mice learn a win-shift but not a win-stay contingency under water escape motivation. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 387-393. PDF

Our current area of interest is implicit learning. In humans, this type of learning refers to learning that occurs in the absence of awareness. In a nonhuman, implicit learning may be defined as learning that occurs in the absence of explicit contingencies of reinforcement to learn. The following articles, using cotton-top tamarins (the monkey on the home page), illustrates this work:

Locurto, C., Gagne, M., & Levesque, K. (2009).Implicit chaining in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 116-122. PDF

Locurto, C., Gagne, M., & Nutile, L. (2010). Characteristics of implicit chaining in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Animal Cognition, 13, 617-629.