Gender: Are Women Subordinate Everywhere?
10/29/08
I. Women: A "Muted" Perspective
A. 1970s feminists: anthropology has male bias1. Anthropologists assume women are subordinateB. Edwin Ardener, "Belief and the Problem of Women" (1972)
2. Societies studied devalue women
3. Cultural bias of anthropologists: differences between men and women assumd to mean the same thing as in anthropologists' own culture1. Women as "muted group": silenced by structures of subordination, can only express selves through men's languageC. Look beyond women's experiences to try to see universal patterns of gender relations and ideas that lead to women's subordination
2. Anthropology doubly subordinates womena. Silenced within own societies3. Wolf's uterine family is "muted"
b. Lack of voice not recognized by anthropologists
II. The Difference between Sex and Gender
A. Sex: biological, genetic, and phenotypic
B. Gender: cultural, ideological system of defining difference
III. Are Women Subordinate Everywhere?
A. Gender varies, but women seem universally inferior
B. Sherry Ortner, "Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?" (1974)1. Women's subordination not simply due to physical differencesC. Ortner's model links sexual ideologies, stereotypes, social roles, and cultural meanings
2. Culture/nature distinction
3. Women handle physical reproduction, closer to nature, domestic sphere
4. Men handle social, technological reproduction, closer to culture, public sphere
5. Culture > nature, so man > woman
IV. Problems with Universal Subordination Theory
A. Ignores economic explanations
B. Nature/culture distinction isn't universal1. Taoism, chi, and feng shui
2. Gimi and forest as source of male power
V. The Cultural Construction of Sex and Gender
A. Unlike causes can produce like effects
B. Gender relations are cultural, social, and symbolic systems with unique history
For more information, contact: aleshkow@holycross.edu