Money, Gender, and Value under Capitalism
11/19/08
I. Marcel Mauss (1872-1950) and His Critique of Capitalism
A. The Hau: Giving, receiving, and reciprocating
B. Critique of capitalism1. Forgotten hauC. Value emerges through human relationships
2. Social security
D. Total social fact1. "all kinds of institutions are given expression at one and the same time -- religious, juridical, and moral, which relate to both politics and the family" (3)
II. Evaluating Mauss
A. Armchair anthropology at its best: detailed, meticulously researched, theoretically powerful
B. Possible limitations1. Too rule-oriented
2. Over-emphasizes distinction between gifts and commodities, personal and impersonal goods
3. Social security doesn't necessarily create direct relations of mutual dependence, social solidarity
III. Use Value, Exchange Value, and Gender
A. Karl Marx, Capital1. Use value: value of an item comes from its functionB. Barter: immediate exchange of use values
2. Exchange value: "The proportion, in which use-values of one kind exchange for use-values of another kind."
C. Capitalism: money extends exchanges over time and space1. Exchange value predominatesD. Carstens: women in Malay fishing village "cook" the money men generate by transforming it from exchange value to household use value
2. Money as dark force, corrodes social relationsa. Labor theory of value
b. Alienation of labor (compare to Mauss and hau)
c. Money as universal equivalent, everything has a price: example of women, housework, and feminism in the US
d. Radical leveler: destroys social bonds of mutual dependence
For more information, contact: aleshkow@holycross.edu